Trump’s right: It’s not a Muslim ban, it’s a screening process to protect us

As a former refugee from Iraq and a proud American citizen, I’ve followed closely the public debate and legal battle right through Monday’s Supreme Court decision about President Trump’s travel ban. But I haven’t talked to many people who have actually read it.

If they did, and knew their recent history, they would find that this travel ban is essentially no different — and no more aggressive — than other policies handed down by Democratic and Republican administrations.

Consider this: In 2016, Christians and Yazidis made up less than 1 percent of refugees coming to the United States from Syria, even though the two religious groups together are well above 10 percent of the country’s general population — and were on the receiving end of most of the persecution. The Muslim population was far over-represented in the refugees who were allowed into the United States.

So President Obama’s policies in reality favored Muslim refugees from Syria over and above Christian refugees — by a long shot. All the while a veritable genocide was taking place against Christians in the Middle East at the hands of militant groups like ISIS.

When I came to this country as a refugee in 1982 after fleeing the Iran-Iraq war, I was also held up by restrictions on refugees. But it was something I fully expected. I’ve never met any refugees from the Middle East who expected to have the welcome mat automatically rolled out for them in any country they chose — especially the United States, which arguably has the single biggest target on its back for terrorists.

That’s because securing the blessings of liberty means taking certain measures when allowing people to cross our borders from nations that have been shown to harbor terrorists.

Trump knows this. And Obama did, too, when he also targeted immigrants from the same seven countries under his visa-waiver program in 2016.

So it’s asinine to think one can decry Trump’s executive order as a “Muslim ban,” after having said nothing about Obama’s visa-waiver program, which made few headlines.

Like millions of other refugees in the early 1980s, I had to go through a screening process in order to be accepted into the United States. And I thank God that because of an executive order from President Ronald Reagan, I was able to reunite with my family here.

Today, even though I’m a citizen of this great country, I’m still singled out when it comes to travel. I often go through extra screening, I’m asked extra questions, and I receive much more scrutiny than white Americans any time I re-enter the United States.

Why? Because there are people who look like me, talk like me and have names similar to mine who want to do harm to this nation. So I welcome any additional screening because it means our government is doing its job of keeping our people safe.

Should we show compassion to the hurting? Yes. Should we help those — Christians and Muslims alike — who truly want nothing more than a peaceful life? Absolutely.

But doing so also means we have to understand there are bad elements infiltrating the global refugee community.

I hope America will take this temporary travel ban and become better at vetting those who want to enter our country. And until this period is over, we would do well to be patient and allow government officials to do the work they were elected to do: keep our country safe.

Jalil Dawood is the author of “The Refugee: A Story of God’s Grace and Hope on One Man’s Road to Refuge” and the founder of World Refugee Care.

©2017 The Philadelphia Inquirer


Never miss a local story.

Sign up today for a 30 day free trial of unlimited digital access.


Article Trump’s right: It’s not a Muslim ban, it’s a screening process to protect us compiled by

Recommended stories

Relax Trump’s right: It’s not a Muslim ban, it’s a screening process to protect us stories

Will travel ban be Republicans’s first big break with Trump?

Republicans face their first big test about whether to break with their party’s new president following the Supreme Court’s decision to allow Donald Trump’s contentious travel ban against citizens from six Muslim-majority nations to take effect.

Trump vs. Trump

With an endless Internet archive of tweets, stump speeches, and campaign missives at their fingertips, Trump’s opponents have a full arsenal to fight him in court.

Trump right to make Cuba pay for its intransigence

In the two and a half years since the Obama administration announced the thaw with Cuba, which we applauded — and still do — the United States has made most of the concessions, while has given very little, especially in the realm of human rights, in return.

Trump already has the wall he needs the most

Attorney General Jeff Sessions seems to have stonewalled the senators with two purposes: (1) to loyally protect his boss, President Trump; and (2) in a desperate bid to save his own job (see 1).

President Trump is an ‘F’ student

The GOP asks us to put their party above our country, to grade Donald Trump’s presidency on a curve like you would the poor kid who was trying real hard.

Comey paints Trump as a ‘pants on fire’ president

Not since Richard Nixon has a president’s veracity been so blatantly and publicly questioned: At least three times, former FBI Director James Comey implied that he feared the president would lie, and he told the Senate Intelligence Committee in no uncertain terms.

London mayor shows Trump how to be a leader

Sadiq Khan did everything Western society tells brown people to do. He worked hard. He sought an education. He rose through the ranks. He assimilated. But in Trump’s worldview, he should be judged solely for being Muslim.

Legal experts to Trump on travel ban: Twitter hurting cause

Legal experts say President Donald Trump may have undercut his own administration's efforts to resurrect his stalled travel ban when he bashed the Justice Department for asking the Supreme Court to review a "watered-down, politically correct" measure.

Trump turns to Supreme Court to move forward on travel ban

The Trump administration on Thursday asked the Supreme Court to let it move forward with the president's plan to temporarily ban citizens from six mostly Muslim countries, elevating a divisive legal battle involving national security and religious discrimination to the nation's highest court.

Trump must do better by Haitians than Obama did

More than 50,000 Haitians in the United States were granted Temporary Protected Status in 2010 after the devastating earthquake. It has been seven years, however, Haiti still has not recovered, and there has been a series of other disasters since. The Trump administration should extend TPS.

More stories